Arborlook
Risk & Response by Arborlook Insights

Grapevine Mesa Fire District

COMBINATION AZ 1 Stations
9,014
Est. Population
1598.9
Sq Miles
6
Density / Sq Mi
5
Census Tracts
Relatively Moderate
NRI Risk Rating

Service Area Overview

Your department boundary, station locations, and overall NRI risk scores by census tract. Use the sections below to explore specific hazards, fire risk indicators, and EMS demand drivers across your service area.

Service area, population, and census tract assignments are based on department boundaries from NERIS Public. Boundary accuracy varies by jurisdiction.

Natural Hazard Risk

What this means for planning: With a risk score of 86.3 (Very High nationally), heat wave is your leading natural hazard. Partner with community facilities for cooling centers, develop wellness check protocols for vulnerable populations, and ensure personnel are trained on heat illness recognition and treatment.

Top 5 Hazards in Your Service Area

Sorted by life-safety impact. Life-safety loss uses FEMA’s Value of Statistical Life ($13.7M per fatality or 10 injuries). NRI methodology

Hazard Risk Score Rating Life-Safety Loss
$/yr
Total Loss
$/yr
Heat Wave TOP LIFE-SAFETY HAZARD 86.3 Very High $455K/yr $455K/yr
River Flood 59.8 Relatively Moderate $146K/yr $2.8M/yr
Wildfire 96.2 Very High $87K/yr $2.2M/yr
Lightning 77.5 Relatively High $82K/yr $84K/yr
Winter Weather 73.2 Relatively High $20K/yr $22K/yr

How to read this map: Colors show absolute national risk levels (red = Very High nationally, green = Very Low nationally). These are objective hazard comparisons across all U.S. communities.

Historical Disaster Declarations

Your county has experienced 2 FEMA disaster declarations in the last 10 years, and 9 declarations in the last 25 years.

DateTypeTitle
2020-04-04BiologicalCOVID-19 PANDEMIC
2020-03-13BiologicalCOVID-19
2015-08-09FireWILLOW FIRE
2013-07-02FireDEAN PEAK FIRE
2010-03-18Severe StormSEVERE WINTER STORMS AND FLOODING

Demographics & Vulnerability

Why This Matters

Your community's demographics shape everything: from where you need smoke alarm programs to how many of your calls are EMS. The data below identifies who generates the most emergency demand, who faces the greatest barriers during emergencies, and who benefits most from targeted CRR outreach.

Age Distribution

Age drives EMS call volume (highest utilization: 65+ and especially 75+, with elevated rates also among children under 5), shapes fire safety education priorities, and determines evacuation assistance needs. The dark marker on each bar shows the national average.

Under 5
3.1% (277)
Ages 5-17
11.8% (1,060)
Ages 18-64
45.8% (4,132)
Ages 65-74
19.4% (1,752)
Ages 75-84
15.8% (1,420)
Ages 85+
4.1% (373)
Your Community
National Average

Social Vulnerability Indicators

These indicators identify populations that need additional support during emergencies, face barriers to self-evacuation or medical access, and benefit most from proactive CRR programming.

Vulnerability Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, evacuation assistance needs, accessible communication requirements
31.5% 15.8% 13.4% 2.0x higher
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to safety resources
26.9% 13.5% 12.5% 2.0x higher
Uninsured Rate
May delay medical care, leading to emergencies
9.5% 9.1% 8.3% ≈ average
Limited English Households
Language barrier to emergency communication
0.5% 2.5% 4.3% 4.7x lower
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
2.8% 3.1% 8.7% ≈ average
No Internet Access
Disconnected from digital emergency alerts
10.6% 9.9% 6.7% ≈ average

Economic Context

Median Household Income
$40,124
Peers: $72,126 · National: $89,476
Per Capita Income
$23,622
Peers: $42,429 · National: $44,519
Median Home Value
$163,438
Peers: $339,464 · National: $402,761

Fire Risk Factors

What this means for planning: 27.2% of housing units are vacant, 2.6x higher the national average. Vacant properties have elevated fire risk due to lack of maintenance, unauthorized access, and delayed detection. Work with code enforcement on vacant property inspections and securing abandoned structures.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Pre-1980 Housing
Pre-1980 construction standards
25.7% 21.3% 36.3% slightly higher
Wood Heating
Wood stoves and fireplaces as primary heat
8.2% 10.8% 1.4% slightly lower
Vacancy Rate
Vacant properties at higher fire risk
27.2% 26.3% 10.3% ≈ average
Mobile Homes
Structural fire spread risk
37.8% 16.9% 5.8% 2.2x higher
Renter-Occupied
Higher turnover, variable maintenance
25.0% 17.8% 34.7% slightly higher

EMS Risk Factors

EMS typically accounts for 60-80% of fire department call volume nationally. The demographics below are the strongest predictors of where that demand comes from in your service area.

What this means for planning: 31.5% of residents have a disability, 2.3x higher the national average. Residents with disabilities have higher EMS utilization and may require specialized evacuation assistance, accessible communication during emergencies, and coordination with social services. Consider functional needs assessments in pre-incident planning and partnerships with disability advocacy organizations.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Population 65+
Highest EMS utilization group
39.3% 23.4% 17.4% 1.7x higher
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, specialized assistance needs
31.5% 15.8% 13.4% 2.0x higher
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
2.8% 3.1% 8.7% ≈ average
Uninsured Rate
May delay care, leading to emergencies
9.5% 9.1% 8.3% ≈ average
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to healthcare access
26.9% 13.5% 12.5% 2.0x higher

Peer Comparison

Departments similar to yours in size, type, density class, and region. Peer benchmarks contextualize your community risk profile and support “demonstrated need” narratives in grant applications.

Department State Population Risk Score 65+ % Poverty % Stations
Grapevine Mesa Fire District (You) AZ 9,014 54.5 39.3% 26.9% 1
Lake Mohave Ranchos Fire District AZ 9,014 54.5 39.3% 26.9% 1
Hartsel Fire Protection District CO 4,842 59.4 31.8% 2.6% 10
North-West Fire Protection District CO 8,374 42.4 24.4% 4.7% 3
Jefferson-Como Fire Protection District CO 6,115 57.4 23.0% 1.2% 10

Your Community Risk Profile Is Half the Story

This page shows what your community faces. Connecting your NERIS data shows the other half: where response is slowest in your highest-risk areas, whether you're meeting NFPA benchmarks, and how your CRR investments are performing against actual demand.

Start Your Free 30-Day Trial

See a live demo first →

Already a subscriber? Log in →