Arborlook
Risk & Response by Arborlook Insights

Lake Forest Fire Protection District

VOLUNTEER CA
6,470
Population
0.2
Sq Miles
27,401
Density / Sq Mi
2
Census Tracts
Relatively High
NRI Risk Rating

Service Area Overview

Your department boundary, station locations, and overall NRI risk scores by census tract. Use the sections below to explore specific hazards, fire risk indicators, and EMS demand drivers across your service area.

Data sources: Department boundaries and station locations are from NERIS Public and updated approximately quarterly. Population and census tract data are derived from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. To report a boundary or station error, submit a helpdesk ticket to NERIS at neris.atlassian.net/servicedesk.

Natural Hazard Risk

What this means for planning: With a risk score of 85.3 (Very High nationally), flooding is your leading natural hazard. Prioritize swift water rescue training, high-water vehicle rescue protocols, and coordination with emergency management on flood-prone area mapping and evacuation routes.

Top 5 Hazards in Your Service Area

  • River Flood
    85.3 Risk Score $2.9M/yr exp. annual loss Very High
  • Wildfire
    97.1 Risk Score $818K/yr exp. annual loss Very High
  • Earthquake
    81.2 Risk Score $512K/yr exp. annual loss Very High
  • Winter Weather
    91.1 Risk Score $39K/yr exp. annual loss Very High
  • Lightning
    46.4 Risk Score $22K/yr exp. annual loss Relatively Moderate

How to read this map: Colors show absolute national risk levels (red = Very High nationally, green = Very Low nationally). These are objective hazard comparisons across all U.S. communities.

Historical Disaster Declarations

Your county has experienced 8 FEMA disaster declarations in the last 10 years, and 11 declarations in the last 25 years.

DateTypeTitle
2021-08-24FireWILDFIRES
2021-07-20FireDIXIE FIRE
2020-08-22FireSHEEP FIRE
2020-08-22FireWILDFIRES
2020-03-22BiologicalCOVID-19 PANDEMIC

Demographics & Vulnerability

Why This Matters

Your community's demographics shape everything: from where you need smoke alarm programs to how many of your calls are EMS. The data below identifies who generates the most emergency demand, who faces the greatest barriers during emergencies, and who benefits most from targeted CRR outreach.

Age Distribution

Age drives EMS call volume (highest utilization: 65+ and especially 75+, with elevated rates also among children under 5), shapes fire safety education priorities, and determines evacuation assistance needs. The dark marker on each bar shows the national average.

Under 5
4.2% (272)
Ages 5-17
17.1% (1,105)
Ages 18-64
57.1% (3,692)
Ages 65-74
13.6% (881)
Ages 75-84
5.6% (364)
Ages 85+
2.4% (156)
Your Community
National Average

Social Vulnerability Indicators

These indicators identify populations that need additional support during emergencies, face barriers to self-evacuation or medical access, and benefit most from proactive CRR programming.

Vulnerability Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, evacuation assistance needs, accessible communication requirements
15.0% 19.3% 13.4% slightly lower
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to safety resources
15.0% 13.2% 12.4% ≈ average
Uninsured Rate
May delay medical care, leading to emergencies
6.5% 5.6% 8.2% slightly higher
Limited English Households
Language barrier to emergency communication
2.1% 0.6% 4.2% 3.8x higher
No Vehicle Access
Transport-dependent for evacuation
3.1% 4.5% 8.5% slightly lower
No Internet Access
Disconnected from digital emergency alerts
6.8% 8.9% 6.6% slightly lower

Economic Context

Median Household Income
$76,785
Peers: $73,368 · National: $89,949
Per Capita Income
$35,791
Peers: $39,219 · National: $44,638
Median Home Value
$240,902
Peers: $356,653 · National: $402,984

Fire Risk Factors

What this means for planning: 48.8% of households use high-risk heating fuels (wood, fuel oil, coal). Prioritize public education on heating safety, chimney inspections, proper fuel storage, and clearance around heating equipment. Partner with code enforcement on rental property inspections during heating season.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Pre-1980 Housing
Pre-1980 construction standards
59.6% 36.0% 36.0% 1.7x higher
High-Risk Heating
Wood, fuel oil, coal
48.8% 23.3% 5.7% 2.1x higher
Vacancy Rate
Vacant properties at higher fire risk
33.8% 18.7% 10.3% 1.8x higher
Mobile Homes
Structural fire spread risk
6.5% 16.0% 5.8% 2.5x lower
Renter-Occupied
Higher turnover, variable maintenance
30.4% 21.1% 34.4% slightly higher

EMS Risk Factors

EMS typically accounts for 60-80% of fire department call volume nationally. The demographics below are the strongest predictors of where that demand comes from in your service area.

What this means for planning: 21.7% of residents are over 65. Older populations typically have higher EMS utilization rates. Consider community paramedicine programs for wellness checks, medication management support, and fall prevention education.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Population 65+
Highest EMS utilization group
21.7% 26.6% 17.4% slightly lower
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, specialized assistance needs
15.0% 19.3% 13.4% slightly lower
No Vehicle Access
Transport-dependent for medical access
3.1% 4.5% 8.5% slightly lower
Uninsured Rate
May delay care, leading to emergencies
6.5% 5.6% 8.2% slightly higher
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to healthcare access
15.0% 13.2% 12.4% ≈ average

Peer Comparison

Departments similar to yours in size, type, density class, and region. Peer benchmarks contextualize your community risk profile and support “demonstrated need” narratives in grant applications.

Department State Population Risk Score 65+ % Poverty % Stations
Lake Forest Fire Protection District (You) CA 6,470 68 21.7% 15.0% 1
City Of Asotin Fire Department WA 9,648 65.8 25.4% 9.7% 1
Kettle Falls Fire Department/ Fire District 6 WA 7,643 74 31.9% 13.1% 1
Clear Creek Fire Department CA 4,515 80.3 35.2% 14.5% 1
Northport Fire Department WA 4,546 82.2 28.0% 12.4% 0

Station counts are from NERIS Public, updated approximately quarterly. To report an error, submit a helpdesk ticket to NERIS at neris.atlassian.net/servicedesk.

Your Community Risk Profile Is Half the Story

This page shows what your community faces. Connecting your NERIS data shows the other half: where response is slowest in your highest-risk areas, whether you're meeting NFPA benchmarks, and how your CRR investments are performing against actual demand.

See a Live Demo

View pricing & start a 30-day trial →

Already a subscriber? Log in →