Arborlook
Risk & Response by Arborlook Insights

Porterville Fire Department

CAREER CA 3 Stations
72,107
Est. Population
18.9
Sq Miles
3,821
Density / Sq Mi
18
Census Tracts
Very High
NRI Risk Rating

Service Area Overview

Your department boundary, station locations, and overall NRI risk scores by census tract. Use the sections below to explore specific hazards, fire risk indicators, and EMS demand drivers across your service area.

Service area, population, and census tract assignments are based on department boundaries from NERIS Public. Boundary accuracy varies by jurisdiction.

Natural Hazard Risk

What this means for planning: With a risk score of 94.7 (Very High nationally), heat wave is your leading natural hazard. Partner with community facilities for cooling centers, develop wellness check protocols for vulnerable populations, and ensure personnel are trained on heat illness recognition and treatment.

Top 5 Hazards in Your Service Area

Sorted by life-safety impact. Life-safety loss uses FEMA’s Value of Statistical Life ($13.7M per fatality or 10 injuries). NRI methodology

Hazard Risk Score Rating Life-Safety Loss
$/yr
Total Loss
$/yr
Heat Wave TOP LIFE-SAFETY HAZARD 94.7 Very High $3.2M/yr $3.9M/yr
Earthquake 82.8 Very High $879K/yr $4.0M/yr
Lightning 67 Relatively High $212K/yr $217K/yr
Wildfire 59.9 Relatively Moderate $73K/yr $737K/yr
River Flood 93.7 Very High $46K/yr $26.2M/yr

How to read this map: Colors show absolute national risk levels (red = Very High nationally, green = Very Low nationally). These are objective hazard comparisons across all U.S. communities.

Historical Disaster Declarations

Your county has experienced 10 FEMA disaster declarations in the last 10 years, and 13 declarations in the last 25 years.

DateTypeTitle
2023-04-03Severe StormSEVERE WINTER STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
2023-03-10FloodSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
2023-01-14FloodSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
2023-01-09FloodSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES
2020-09-13FireSQF FIRE COMPLEX

Demographics & Vulnerability

Why This Matters

Your community's demographics shape everything: from where you need smoke alarm programs to how many of your calls are EMS. The data below identifies who generates the most emergency demand, who faces the greatest barriers during emergencies, and who benefits most from targeted CRR outreach.

Age Distribution

Age drives EMS call volume (highest utilization: 65+ and especially 75+, with elevated rates also among children under 5), shapes fire safety education priorities, and determines evacuation assistance needs. The dark marker on each bar shows the national average.

Under 5
7.3% (5,231)
Ages 5-17
22.8% (16,463)
Ages 18-64
57.6% (41,562)
Ages 65-74
7.4% (5,335)
Ages 75-84
3.4% (2,432)
Ages 85+
1.5% (1,084)
Your Community
National Average

Social Vulnerability Indicators

These indicators identify populations that need additional support during emergencies, face barriers to self-evacuation or medical access, and benefit most from proactive CRR programming.

Vulnerability Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, evacuation assistance needs, accessible communication requirements
12.1% 13.1% 13.4% ≈ average
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to safety resources
19.7% 13.0% 12.5% 1.5x higher
Uninsured Rate
May delay medical care, leading to emergencies
7.1% 6.5% 8.3% ≈ average
Limited English Households
Language barrier to emergency communication
15.0% 7.2% 4.3% 2.1x higher
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
6.4% 6.1% 8.7% ≈ average
No Internet Access
Disconnected from digital emergency alerts
9.1% 4.0% 6.7% 2.3x higher

Economic Context

Median Household Income
$57,382
Peers: $102,414 · National: $89,476
Per Capita Income
$23,096
Peers: $49,646 · National: $44,519
Median Home Value
$283,546
Peers: $726,854 · National: $402,761

Fire Risk Factors

What this means for planning: Focus fire prevention efforts on cooking safety (leading cause of home fires), heating equipment safety, electrical hazards, and smoke alarm installation programs. Target education toward renters and multi-family buildings where fire incidence is typically higher.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Pre-1980 Housing
Pre-1980 construction standards
50.9% 35.1% 36.3% slightly higher
Wood Heating
Wood stoves and fireplaces as primary heat
1.2% 0.5% 1.4% 2.2x higher
Vacancy Rate
Vacant properties at higher fire risk
5.6% 6.5% 10.3% ≈ average
Mobile Homes
Structural fire spread risk
8.4% 3.3% 5.8% 2.6x higher
Renter-Occupied
Higher turnover, variable maintenance
45.5% 47.2% 34.7% ≈ average

EMS Risk Factors

EMS typically accounts for 60-80% of fire department call volume nationally. The demographics below are the strongest predictors of where that demand comes from in your service area.

What this means for planning: Economic barriers to healthcare access (poverty: 19.7%, uninsured: 7.1%) can lead to delayed treatment and preventable emergencies. Partner with federally qualified health centers and social services to connect vulnerable residents with primary care resources.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Population 65+
Highest EMS utilization group
12.3% 15.6% 17.4% slightly lower
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, specialized assistance needs
12.1% 13.1% 13.4% ≈ average
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
6.4% 6.1% 8.7% ≈ average
Uninsured Rate
May delay care, leading to emergencies
7.1% 6.5% 8.3% ≈ average
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to healthcare access
19.7% 13.0% 12.5% 1.5x higher

Peer Comparison

Departments similar to yours in size, type, density class, and region. Peer benchmarks contextualize your community risk profile and support “demonstrated need” narratives in grant applications.

Department State Population Risk Score 65+ % Poverty % Stations
Porterville Fire Department (You) CA 72,107 82.8 12.3% 19.7% 3
Madera City Fire Department CA 60,792 78 10.5% 24.1% 2
El Centro Fire Department CA 40,107 94 13.9% 21.1% 5
Olympia Fire Department WA 53,134 85.9 20.3% 12.7% 4
Lakewood Fire District 2 WA 105,327 72.5 17.3% 11.5% 5

Your Community Risk Profile Is Half the Story

This page shows what your community faces. Connecting your NERIS data shows the other half: where response is slowest in your highest-risk areas, whether you're meeting NFPA benchmarks, and how your CRR investments are performing against actual demand.

Start Your Free 30-Day Trial

See a live demo first →

Already a subscriber? Log in →