Arborlook
Risk & Response by Arborlook Insights

Otto Township Fire Protection District

VOLUNTEER IL 1 Stations
10,177
Est. Population
41.2
Sq Miles
247
Density / Sq Mi
3
Census Tracts
Very High
NRI Risk Rating

Service Area Overview

Your department boundary, station locations, and overall NRI risk scores by census tract. Use the sections below to explore specific hazards, fire risk indicators, and EMS demand drivers across your service area.

Service area, population, and census tract assignments are based on department boundaries from NERIS Public. Boundary accuracy varies by jurisdiction.

Natural Hazard Risk

What this means for planning: With a risk score of 94.1 (Very High nationally), cold wave is your leading natural hazard. Focus on cold-exposure emergency response, warming center partnerships, and proactive wellness checks for vulnerable populations during extreme cold events.

Top 5 Hazards in Your Service Area

Sorted by life-safety impact. Life-safety loss uses FEMA’s Value of Statistical Life ($13.7M per fatality or 10 injuries). NRI methodology

Hazard Risk Score Rating Life-Safety Loss
$/yr
Total Loss
$/yr
Cold Wave TOP LIFE-SAFETY HAZARD 94.1 Very High $1.9M/yr $1.9M/yr
Tornado 75.9 Relatively High $157K/yr $584K/yr
Heat Wave 52 Relatively Moderate $111K/yr $112K/yr
Strong Wind 78.4 Relatively High $64K/yr $146K/yr
Earthquake 72.3 Relatively High $60K/yr $276K/yr

How to read this map: Colors show absolute national risk levels (red = Very High nationally, green = Very Low nationally). These are objective hazard comparisons across all U.S. communities.

Historical Disaster Declarations

Your county has experienced 4 FEMA disaster declarations in the last 10 years, and 11 declarations in the last 25 years.

DateTypeTitle
2020-03-26BiologicalCOVID-19 PANDEMIC
2020-03-13BiologicalCOVID-19
2008-03-07Severe StormSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
2005-09-07HurricaneHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
2004-04-23Severe StormSEVERE STORMS AND TORNADOES

Demographics & Vulnerability

Why This Matters

Your community's demographics shape everything: from where you need smoke alarm programs to how many of your calls are EMS. The data below identifies who generates the most emergency demand, who faces the greatest barriers during emergencies, and who benefits most from targeted CRR outreach.

Age Distribution

Age drives EMS call volume (highest utilization: 65+ and especially 75+, with elevated rates also among children under 5), shapes fire safety education priorities, and determines evacuation assistance needs. The dark marker on each bar shows the national average.

Under 5
6.9% (699)
Ages 5-17
17.1% (1,740)
Ages 18-64
55.0% (5,601)
Ages 65-74
11.4% (1,159)
Ages 75-84
8.3% (841)
Ages 85+
1.3% (137)
Your Community
National Average

Social Vulnerability Indicators

These indicators identify populations that need additional support during emergencies, face barriers to self-evacuation or medical access, and benefit most from proactive CRR programming.

Vulnerability Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, evacuation assistance needs, accessible communication requirements
20.6% 16.0% 13.4% slightly higher
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to safety resources
11.8% 11.2% 12.5% ≈ average
Uninsured Rate
May delay medical care, leading to emergencies
3.9% 7.1% 8.3% 1.9x lower
Limited English Households
Language barrier to emergency communication
1.2% 0.8% 4.3% slightly higher
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
4.6% 5.6% 8.7% slightly lower
No Internet Access
Disconnected from digital emergency alerts
15.1% 11.3% 6.7% slightly higher

Economic Context

Median Household Income
$85,268
Peers: $72,605 · National: $89,476
Per Capita Income
$37,090
Peers: $35,383 · National: $44,519
Median Home Value
$179,298
Peers: $151,475 · National: $402,761

Fire Risk Factors

What this means for planning: Focus fire prevention efforts on cooking safety (leading cause of home fires), heating equipment safety, electrical hazards, and smoke alarm installation programs. Target education toward renters and multi-family buildings where fire incidence is typically higher.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Pre-1980 Housing
Pre-1980 construction standards
67.7% 52.6% 36.3% slightly higher
Wood Heating
Wood stoves and fireplaces as primary heat
0.2% 3.8% 1.4% 19.4x lower
Vacancy Rate
Vacant properties at higher fire risk
9.8% 11.4% 10.3% ≈ average
Mobile Homes
Structural fire spread risk
12.3% 8.4% 5.8% slightly higher
Renter-Occupied
Higher turnover, variable maintenance
22.3% 20.0% 34.7% ≈ average

EMS Risk Factors

EMS typically accounts for 60-80% of fire department call volume nationally. The demographics below are the strongest predictors of where that demand comes from in your service area.

What this means for planning: 20.6% of residents have a disability, 1.5x higher the national average. Residents with disabilities have higher EMS utilization and may require specialized evacuation assistance, accessible communication during emergencies, and coordination with social services. Consider functional needs assessments in pre-incident planning and partnerships with disability advocacy organizations.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Population 65+
Highest EMS utilization group
21.0% 20.6% 17.4% ≈ average
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, specialized assistance needs
20.6% 16.0% 13.4% slightly higher
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
4.6% 5.6% 8.7% slightly lower
Uninsured Rate
May delay care, leading to emergencies
3.9% 7.1% 8.3% 1.9x lower
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to healthcare access
11.8% 11.2% 12.5% ≈ average

Peer Comparison

Departments similar to yours in size, type, density class, and region. Peer benchmarks contextualize your community risk profile and support “demonstrated need” narratives in grant applications.

Department State Population Risk Score 65+ % Poverty % Stations
Otto Township Fire Protection District (You) IL 10,177 85.1 21.0% 11.8% 1
Hoffman Fire Protection District IL 10,449 86.5 19.8% 11.9% 1
Unit # 7 Fire Protection District IL 12,868 84.7 23.2% 10.6% 1
Wyanet Fire Protection District IL 11,966 85 22.9% 13.4% 1
Orangeville Fire Protection District IL 11,391 86.5 24.9% 6.7% 1

Your Community Risk Profile Is Half the Story

This page shows what your community faces. Connecting your NERIS data shows the other half: where response is slowest in your highest-risk areas, whether you're meeting NFPA benchmarks, and how your CRR investments are performing against actual demand.

Start Your Free 30-Day Trial

See a live demo first →

Already a subscriber? Log in →