Arborlook
Risk & Response by Arborlook Insights

Proctorsville Fire Department

VOLUNTEER VT 0 Stations
1,603
Est. Population
44.3
Sq Miles
36
Density / Sq Mi
1
Census Tracts
Relatively Low
NRI Risk Rating

Service Area Overview

Your department boundary, station locations, and overall NRI risk scores by census tract. Use the sections below to explore specific hazards, fire risk indicators, and EMS demand drivers across your service area.

Service area, population, and census tract assignments are based on department boundaries from NERIS Public. Boundary accuracy varies by jurisdiction.

Natural Hazard Risk

What this means for planning: With a risk score of 38.2 (Relatively Low nationally), cold wave is your leading natural hazard. Focus on cold-exposure emergency response, warming center partnerships, and proactive wellness checks for vulnerable populations during extreme cold events.

Top 5 Hazards in Your Service Area

Sorted by life-safety impact. Life-safety loss uses FEMA’s Value of Statistical Life ($13.7M per fatality or 10 injuries). NRI methodology

Hazard Risk Score Rating Life-Safety Loss
$/yr
Total Loss
$/yr
Cold Wave TOP LIFE-SAFETY HAZARD 38.2 Relatively Low $36K/yr $37K/yr
Heat Wave 34.9 Relatively Low $29K/yr $30K/yr
River Flood 51.3 Relatively Moderate $22K/yr $736K/yr
Lightning 48.8 Relatively Moderate $13K/yr $14K/yr
Tornado 30.9 Relatively Low $11K/yr $23K/yr

How to read this map: Colors show absolute national risk levels (red = Very High nationally, green = Very Low nationally). These are objective hazard comparisons across all U.S. communities.

Historical Disaster Declarations

Your county has experienced 9 FEMA disaster declarations in the last 10 years, and 18 declarations in the last 25 years.

DateTypeTitle
2024-08-08Tropical StormTROPICAL DEPRESSION DEBBY
2024-03-02Severe StormSEVERE STORM AND FLOODING
2023-07-14FloodSEVERE STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
2023-07-10FloodFLOODING
2021-08-22HurricaneTROPICAL STORM HENRI

Demographics & Vulnerability

Why This Matters

Your community's demographics shape everything: from where you need smoke alarm programs to how many of your calls are EMS. The data below identifies who generates the most emergency demand, who faces the greatest barriers during emergencies, and who benefits most from targeted CRR outreach.

Age Distribution

Age drives EMS call volume (highest utilization: 65+ and especially 75+, with elevated rates also among children under 5), shapes fire safety education priorities, and determines evacuation assistance needs. The dark marker on each bar shows the national average.

Under 5
6.3% (101)
Ages 5-17
9.9% (158)
Ages 18-64
62.3% (998)
Ages 65-74
13.3% (213)
Ages 75-84
7.0% (113)
Ages 85+
1.2% (20)
Your Community
National Average

Social Vulnerability Indicators

These indicators identify populations that need additional support during emergencies, face barriers to self-evacuation or medical access, and benefit most from proactive CRR programming.

Vulnerability Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, evacuation assistance needs, accessible communication requirements
16.0% 13.4% 13.4% slightly higher
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to safety resources
5.1% 6.4% 12.5% slightly lower
Uninsured Rate
May delay medical care, leading to emergencies
6.5% 3.3% 8.3% 2.0x higher
Limited English Households
Language barrier to emergency communication
0.0% 0.5% 4.3% Infx lower
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
1.7% 2.8% 8.7% 1.6x lower
No Internet Access
Disconnected from digital emergency alerts
4.9% 5.0% 6.7% ≈ average

Economic Context

Median Household Income
$93,155
Peers: $92,312 · National: $89,476
Per Capita Income
$50,066
Peers: $52,211 · National: $44,519
Median Home Value
$262,300
Peers: $355,600 · National: $402,761

Fire Risk Factors

What this means for planning: 19.1% of households use wood as primary heating fuel. Prioritize public education on heating safety, chimney inspections, and proper clearance around wood stoves and fireplaces. Partner with code enforcement on rental property inspections during heating season.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Pre-1980 Housing
Pre-1980 construction standards
59.9% 45.7% 36.3% slightly higher
Wood Heating
Wood stoves and fireplaces as primary heat
19.1% 18.8% 1.4% ≈ average
Vacancy Rate
Vacant properties at higher fire risk
42.3% 28.0% 10.3% 1.5x higher
Mobile Homes
Structural fire spread risk
12.1% 5.6% 5.8% 2.1x higher
Renter-Occupied
Higher turnover, variable maintenance
17.7% 10.6% 34.7% 1.7x higher

EMS Risk Factors

EMS typically accounts for 60-80% of fire department call volume nationally. The demographics below are the strongest predictors of where that demand comes from in your service area.

What this means for planning: 21.6% of residents are over 65. Older populations typically have higher EMS utilization rates. Consider community paramedicine programs for wellness checks, medication management support, and fall prevention education.

How to read this map: Colors show relative risk within your jurisdiction (red = highest-need tracts, green = lowest-need). Check the table below for overall levels vs. peers and national averages.

Risk Factor Your Community Peer Average National Average vs. Peers
Population 65+
Highest EMS utilization group
21.6% 24.6% 17.4% ≈ average
Disability Rate
Higher EMS utilization, specialized assistance needs
16.0% 13.4% 13.4% slightly higher
No Vehicle Access
Evacuation risk; higher EMS transport dependence
1.7% 2.8% 8.7% 1.6x lower
Uninsured Rate
May delay care, leading to emergencies
6.5% 3.3% 8.3% 2.0x higher
Poverty Rate
Economic barrier to healthcare access
5.1% 6.4% 12.5% slightly lower

Peer Comparison

Departments similar to yours in size, type, density class, and region. Peer benchmarks contextualize your community risk profile and support “demonstrated need” narratives in grant applications.

Department State Population Risk Score 65+ % Poverty % Stations
Proctorsville Fire Department (You) VT 1,603 20.5 21.6% 5.1% 0
Cavendish Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. VT 1,603 20.5 21.6% 5.1% 2
New Marlborough Fire & Rescue MA 1,501 15 28.1% 2.5% 1
Livermore Fire Department ME 1,868 14.7 24.8% 8.0% 1
Dummerston Volunteer Fire Department VT 2,090 18.9 24.3% 4.5% 2

Your Community Risk Profile Is Half the Story

This page shows what your community faces. Connecting your NERIS data shows the other half: where response is slowest in your highest-risk areas, whether you're meeting NFPA benchmarks, and how your CRR investments are performing against actual demand.

Start Your Free 30-Day Trial

See a live demo first →

Already a subscriber? Log in →